Safety archive
Random-number testing has a specific scope
A laboratory may test statistical output, source code, implementation controls or a selected release. The report should state which. A certificate for an RNG component does not necessarily cover paytables, account settlement or every deployed game version, and an old report may not represent later software changes.
- ANamed test scope
- BApplicable version
- CCurrent report date
Safety archive
Fair randomness and expected return are different
A game can produce random outcomes while retaining a mathematical house edge through its payout table. RTP describes a theoretical long-run return, not whether an individual sequence ‘looks fair’. Short-run losses or wins cannot validate the model, and neither outcome supports a claim that future rounds are due.
- ARandomness versus paytable
- BLong-run expectation
- CNo ‘due’ outcomes
Safety archive
Game integrity does not cover the whole platform
Even strong evidence about a round leaves separate questions about identity data, withdrawals, complaints and legal availability. Australian readers should not treat tested software as permission to access an online casino. A complete safety review keeps game evidence in its lane and examines operational conduct separately.
- ARound evidence is limited
- BOperational conduct differs
- CNo access inference